Examiner les modifications individuelles

De Wiki Dofus
Navigation du filtre anti-abus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal anti-abus)
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche

Cette page vous permet d’examiner les variables générées par le filtre anti-abus pour une modification individuelle et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Nom du compte de l’utilisateur (user_name)
'PasqualeLund5'
ID de la page (page_id)
0
Espace de noms de la page (page_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l’espace de noms) (page_title)
'Are LCD Or PLS Better'
Titre complet de la page (page_prefixedtitle)
'Are LCD Or PLS Better'
Action (action)
'edit'
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
''
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
''
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Texte wiki de l’ancienne page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
''
Texte wiki de la nouvelle page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
'<br>Samsung has finally released a replacement screen for the Samsung J7 Pro. If you cherished this short article and you would like to acquire far more details regarding [https://www.phonepartsfactory.net/en/productdetail-detailid-119.aspx Full Guide] kindly stop by our own webpage. The screens have been produced by LG, but Samsung is trying to steal the thunder of LG in this market. Many are going to say that the LCD or the Liquid Crystal Display technology is better than the LCD screen from LG, but it is still unknown as to which one performs better.<br><br><br><br>The screen on the Samsung J7 Pro is very attractive. The colors are vivid and there are no blotches to speak of. The only downside is that there is not a backlight like the LCD screen, but the brightness and contrast are similar to that of the LCD screens. There is no doubt that this is one of the best screens for the Samsung J7 Pro, but we will still have to wait for a while until we can actually try the LCD screen for ourselves.<br><br><br><br>Samsung says that it has developed its own PLS screen that have better response time, a better resolution and a better color gamut. They claim that the LCD in the J7 Pro has a response time of just 1ms. The resolution is also higher than the LCDs from LG. The color gamut is about equal to that of the LCDs. The difference however, is that the screen on the J7 Pro features an edge to edge viewing angle that cannot be found on the LCD screen of the J7.<br><br><br><br>So, the question is: what is the difference between the LCD and the PLS in the Samsung J7 Pro? It may well be that both screens are of good quality and both have the same color and resolution capabilities. If so, the biggest difference is that the LCD uses a backlight and it uses it effectively, but the LCDs are not very efficient at it. In addition, when it comes to contrast and response time, the LCD is still superior to the PLS. One of the other reasons for the LCD having a better contrast ratio is because it uses pixels with more capacity and therefore displays a much clearer picture.<br><br><br><br>So, what is the difference between the two screens? Both screens use the same basic technology, but their efficiency and power consumption are different. The liquid crystals in the PLS screens are much thinner and they are made up of silicon wafers instead of glass or crystal. This allows the screen to display the image at a lower temperature and provide better response time resolution.<br><br><br><br>Although it is impossible to say which screen is better at this point, it is clear that the PLS is the better choice for the Samsung J7 Pro. It is much thinner and offers a clearer image and the better color and contrast ratios.<br>'
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1641501450